There is additional data that allow us to understand how almost all the trails (persistent or not) have little to do with the condensation of water vapor . In this regard the question of the share of overflying aircraft is essential, and the following digression is one of the many things that were cut from the long interview made to me by the editors of Mystery on the occasion of my participation to the transmission.
"When a jet goes high in the sky, is formed in its wake a cloud of ice crystals clearly visible even if you can not see the device. It is indeed a lucky man for that smaller objects that he knows something, the tiny amount of matter and energy that he called elementary particles, they behave more or less in maniera analoga. Una singola particella elementare è oltre dieci milioni di volte più piccola del più piccolo oggetto visibile al microscopio, eppure, quando essa attraversa una camera a bolle, lascia al suo passaggio una traccia visibile a occhio nudo che può essere fotografata e studiata con tutta comodità”.
 |
| Fare click sull'immagine qui sopra per vederla ingrandita |
Anche se oggi circolano aerei leggermente più grandi di quelli di un tempo, e quindi più facilmente osservabili da lontano, questo brano è una testimonianza historical fact that a plane flying at cruising altitude (around 10 km) is generally not so far away that you see or you can barely see.
In good weather it could just distinguish the outline, but of course you can not see clearly and make out the details. Of course, if we are just below the trajectory of the aircraft, or carried on the aircraft perpendicular to the surface, if we are right under the air corridor which he walked (and if the visibility is good) we can also see something of that 'plane. And this is another very strange thing that we see now of contrails in the sky: we see very well even when the air is visibly far from our vertical.
On the other aircraft at cruising altitude (the only shares which may form condensation trails, the same as confirmation of Colonel 'Air Force De Simone , but deny that chemtrails) the noise it produces is not discernible at ground level (see Appendix at the end of the article) and see the trail of a plane roar and feel a strong distinction far wings of the aircraft nose and tail of the event is tangible proof of chemtrails ... then if the plane is not even on our need to realize that the vertical distance aumenta secondo le note leggi della trigonometria.
Ciò vuol dire che di regola è molto difficile scorgere un aereo che voli intorno ai 10 km di quota, a meno che non sia un aereo militare ( cui sono assegnate quote fra i 5 ed i 6 km ) o un aereo in decollo/atterraggio dall'aeroporto più vicino.
Se continuiamo a leggere il testo summenzionato troviamo scritto in maniera assolutamente inequivocabile:
“al fisico moderno resta il compito, ancopra molto difficile, di ricostruire dalle tracce tracce e dagli scatti dei contatori la natura delle varie particelle elementari, impresa che equivalent to reconstruct the design of a jet ski at high altitude by studying the
is considered unlikely if the company's plan to reconstruct a jet by studying their skiing at high altitude, which means that envelope is not visible to the naked eye, which is fine if it is a shadowy figure.
With regard to the proportion of over-flight of these aircraft is very suspect who has done several experiments to measure both methods trigonometric methods that with the help of a laser , and the results are absolutely incompatible with the hypothesis of normal contrails condensation.
Furthermore there is evidence of overlapping or the fact that you often see planes passing through heaps release trails or clouds belonging to the category of low clouds that form at altitudes between 1,500 and 2,300 meters. The passage under the stratocumulus (other low clouds) is emblematic.
Appendix - Transmission of sound and air chemical - Estimated odds
Given a sound source, that propagates in the same way in all directions according to spherical wave fronts. The surface of the wavefront increases in proportion to the square of the distance from the source. Consequently, the energy that holds the wavefront is distributed over the entire surface, so a single unit of energy that will surface decreases with the square of the distance.
So according to the laws of physics related to the wave propagation when the distance doubles the intensity becomes fourth, if the distance triples the intensity becomes a ninth if the distance becomes 10 times larger, the intensity sound becomes 100 times smaller (10 * 10). Elementary physics.
The decibel is un’unità di misura del suono che si calcola in base ad un rapporto, ovvero in base al logaritmo di un rapporto. Se due grandezze misurano una A e l’altra A/2 (la metà di A) la loro differenza è A/2, ma se calcolo il rapporto espresso in decibel fra le due grandezze fisiche (vedi definizione di decibel ), dal momento che il rapporto tra la prima grandezza e la seconda è 2, ottengo un numero che è uguale a 10*log(2)=3,01 [il logaritmo è per definizione un logaritmo in base 10]
Se due grandezze misurano una A e l’altra A/4 il decremento in decibel è quindi pari a 10*log(2)=6,02. Otteniamo un numero esattamente twice the previous because the properties of logarithms to log (b * c) = log (b) + log (c), and then log (2 * 2) = log (2) + log (2)
applicable regulations (Framework Law 447/95, the propagation of sound outdoors) the noise of a jet at 800 meters above sea level on the vertical must not exceed 75 dB (loud voice at one meter). Since doubling the distance, the sound intensity decreases by 6 dB, we can deduce that a plane over to 1600 meters on the ground moved, on average, a noise ratio of 69 dB (normal conversation at a meter).
increasing tenfold the distance the sound intensity becomes a penny, and then heard the decrease of the intensity in decibels is 10 * log (100) = 10 * 2 = 20, and then you go from 75 to about 55 dB (sound intensity comparable to that of a quiet conversation in a living room). As you climb in altitude, of course, the sound fades away, until it becomes irrelevant and this explains why an airplane at 12,000 feet crossing can not be perceived. Has anyone ever heard the air line before the start of the aerosol operations? In fact, the noise in theory correspond to about 45 dB (the noise heard in a library where it is forbidden to speak and can only whisper), but even less if one takes into account the ' energy dissipated by the sound wave in the air. As for sound levels in decibels referred to above you can look at the bottom of this page of wikipedia already reported previously.
more, reflecting the fact that there is a real conspiracy of the media and a number of organizations that try to hide the reality of the phenomenon of chemtrails is the case of putting the words of Mr. Toselli (member of CICAP ) at a conference on chemtrails in Alexandria (I highly recommend to listen to the recorded speech of the conference to understand that the mezzucoli uses the power to refute the existence of contrails: not refute the data, information, observations, but by all means to discredit the people who talk about it, ridicule , ridiculing their claims on subjects other than those of the trails etc.).
do not know, the studio ... it was said that the sound, when we hear the sound of a vertical plane on to say that this is is below a certain level, without thinking that the sound spreads at 360 degrees so you can be completely shifted to the vertical .
C’è chi si arrampica sugli specchi per “dimostrare” che le scie chimiche non esistono?
Guarda caso il signor Toselli da allora in poi ha abbandonato la sua "lotta" per negare l'esistenza delle scie chimiche.
0 comments:
Post a Comment