Traduzione dell'articolo Whooping Cough Outbreaks Proof That Vaccines Do not Work dellla Dr. Sherri Tenpenny , published on 11 January 2011 on the site http://www.newswithviews.com
The outbreak of epidemics proof that the pertussis vaccine does not work
|
| When immunity (ie, vaccination) fails - kpbs service of the U.S. issuer of San Diego State University |
From January 2010 until the end of November, an epidemiologist of the state of California reported 2625 cases of pertussis, including ten fatal in children, while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 18,586 reported cases in the United States. [1] In these reports it has been suggested that epidemics were caused from the large number of unvaccinated children across the country. However, what these reports failed to mention is that the majority of children who contracted whooping cough had been vaccinated against the disease.
In response to these outbreaks, the state of California passed a law in September 2010. The new law was aimed at children from seventh to twelfth graders [ roughly corresponding to our children who attend the middle school and high school - NdT ]. Starting from school year 2012-2013, parents were told that the students who enroll in the seventh grade will have to provide proof of vaccination.
All this has created some 'confusion since California law allows the possibility of using the exemption due to personal beliefs (PBE) [ personal belief Exemptions ] giving parents the right to refuse vaccines. [3]
According to 2009 data, about 175 schools had percentages of PBE 20 percent or more. Few schools have exemption rates over 70 percent. [4]
While this may seem alarming to some, officials estimate that the total percentage of cases throughout the PBE state is around 2 percent, about 7,200 pupils. Officials believe it is necessary for a proportion of vaccinated at least 93 percent p er ensure the so-called herd immunity against pertussis. Then with 98 percent of California children who receive all vaccines recommended by CDC, the herd immunity should be ensured, and it is not logical to blame the outbreak of unvaccinated persons.
In response to these outbreaks, the state of California passed a law in September 2010. The new law was aimed at children from seventh to twelfth graders [ roughly corresponding to our children who attend the middle school and high school - NdT ]. Starting from school year 2012-2013, parents were told that the students who enroll in the seventh grade will have to provide proof of vaccination.
All this has created some 'confusion since California law allows the possibility of using the exemption due to personal beliefs (PBE) [ personal belief Exemptions ] giving parents the right to refuse vaccines. [3]
According to 2009 data, about 175 schools had percentages of PBE 20 percent or more. Few schools have exemption rates over 70 percent. [4]
While this may seem alarming to some, officials estimate that the total percentage of cases throughout the PBE state is around 2 percent, about 7,200 pupils. Officials believe it is necessary for a proportion of vaccinated at least 93 percent p er ensure the so-called herd immunity against pertussis. Then with 98 percent of California children who receive all vaccines recommended by CDC, the herd immunity should be ensured, and it is not logical to blame the outbreak of unvaccinated persons.
| |
| pertussis in children vaccinated - the study shows that vaccinated children often while not showing symptoms, the infected and can spread the disease, sometimes show different symptoms, less intense, but that last for several weeks. And the herd immunity? |
The failure of vaccines
The pressure for kids of all ages and even the adult members of their families receive the DTP vaccine [ diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis ] is certainly questionable when you look at a sample of well-documented cases of vaccine failure in a community with a large number of cases of pertussis. In 1996, an epidemic spread throughout the country occurred in Vermont, a state where vaccination rates were among the highest of all the United States. Of these children, aged between 19 and 35 months of age who contract whooping cough, 97 percent had received all recommended doses of DPT vaccine.
In 2006, the British Medical Journal reported in a study that a considerable proportion of school-age children that have been immunized and who have a persistent cough may have had a recent infection with Bordetella pertussis. Harnden and his colleagues studied 172 children aged 5 to 16 years who continued to cough for two weeks or more. In 64 of these children was found serologic evidence of recent pertussis infection by and 55 of these children were fully immunized. They argued then that "Make a secure diagnosis of pertussis can reassure parents and prevent the use of investigations and inappropriate treatment." [5]
More recently, the newspaper The Star-Ledger on 11 February 2009, reports of an epidemic of whooping cough that affected 21 children fully immunized in Hunterdon County, New Jersey. [6] In Canada, an outbreak of pertussis confirmed by a laboratory epidemiological spread among preschool children in Toronto, where more than 90% of children were updated with the calls for immunization against pertussis. [7]
|
| atypical outbreak of pertussis in vaccinated children in preschool - site scientific government pubmed.gov |
Il Dottor Fritz Mooi, un autorevole e rispettato scienziato olandese che ha studiato le mutazioni del batterio della pertosse per 15 anni, afferma che un ceppo più virulento del batterio è la causa delle recenti epidemie. Mooi sostiene che l’associazione internazionale, Iniziativa Globale per la Pertosse (Global Pertussis Initiative), ha ignorato la sua teoria circa un nuovo, più tossico, ceppo del batterio della malattia. “Semplicemente non vogliono sentire”, ha detto. “Hanno mantenuto questa informazione fuori dai loro articoli, e questo è una sorta di censura.” Molti soldi sono stati investiti negli attuali vaccini, ha aggiunto Mooi, e se egli he's right about this new strain, then there would be no need to develop a new and different vaccine. [9]
Conflicts of Interest
The Institute for monitoring (Watchdog Institute) kpbs and have also discovered that the two leading global producers of vaccines against pertussis, Sanofi Pasteur and GlaxoSmith Kline, both have funded expert groups recommend that the policy of vaccines to various government agencies. Sanofi Pasteur is funding the most influential group, the Global Pertussis Initiative (Global Pertussis Initiative), which is composed of 35 medical experts from 16 different countries. The Institute for Monitoring and kpbs found that 24 members of the Monitoring Group received funding from Sanofi Pasteur, its parent company Sanofi-Aventis, and / or GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). [10]
The CDC cites the Global Initiative for Pertussis in its publications and the World Health Initiative has four members in their advisory committee for the pertussis vaccine. This conflict of interests is reflected in the spending of millions from countries for a vaccine against whooping cough, which has a long and documented history of lack of protection, with manufacturers reluctant to spend even a fraction of their hefty revenues in research and study emerging of new strains of pertussis.
Globalmente, i vaccini erano un’industria da 22 miliardi di dollari lo scorso anno, ma secondo una recente previsione le vendite dovrebbero raggiungere i 34 miliardi di dollari entro il 2012. Solo nello stato della California, i dipartimenti della salute hanno speso 207 milioni di dollari per i vaccini contro la pertosse dal 2007, con una cifra esorbitante di 59,6 milioni spesi nel solo 2010. [11]
I vaccinati come un vettore silente
L’ìimmunità alla pertosse indotta dei vaccini viene misurata attraverso un esame del sangue, chiamato titer test , il quale misura la presenza di specifici anticorpi che vengono ritenuti essere difensivi nei confronti della malattia. E’ also recognized that these antibodies decrease with time. The incidence of Bordetella pertussis in adolescents and adults appears to be about one percent per year. This infection is most likely called whooping cough, among other seasonal coughs, if it lasts more than twenty-one days. Medical officials believe that the infections in adolescents are caused by "decreasing immunity" is the reason for the transmission of bacteria in the community, particularly for young children.
As a result, have been developed and approved for use in the United States new vaccines, such as Boostrix, for children from 11 to 18 anni di età, e Adacel, per adulti da 19 a 64 anni di età. [12] I funzionari per la salute pubblica sperano così che attraverso la vaccinazione di adolescenti e adulti ci saranno, complessivamente, meno casi di pertosse.
Ciononostante, i vaccini contenenti il batterio B. Pertussis sembrano avere un effetto irrilevante sull’incidenza assoluta dell’infezione. Invece di concentrarsi sulla paura della pertosse, sarebbe altresì ovvio nonchè imperativo concentrarsi sul naturale rafforzamento del sistema immunitario e sull’utilità e la diffusione di semplici misure di salute pubblica. Piccoli aiuti alla salute personale e collettiva quali il lavaggio delle mani, un buon riposo di otto ore per notte, the integration of vitamin C and maintaining a high blood level of vitamin D have a basic foundation for the prevention of all infectious diseases, including whooping cough. Obviously, for public health officials would need to embrace these methods are not poisonous and non-invasive rather than unnecessary injections which can cause severe damage in the short and long term.
Sources:
1, MMWR. Pertussis Weekly Update. Week 48
2 "New California Law Mandates whooping Cough Booster Shot for Teens," January 3, 2011.
4, Whooping Cough now epidemic in California . ABC Healthnews. June 24, 2010.
6, “Whooping Cough returns to Hunterdon County” by Mike Frasinelli, The Star-Ledger, February 11, 2009 .
7, Waters, Valerie et al. “Outbreak of Atypical Pertussis Detected by Polymerase Chain Reaction in Immunized Preschool-Aged Children.” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 28(7):582-587, July 2009.
8, “Many whooping cough victims have been immunized; Experts spar over prospects of new disease strain,” by Kevin Crowe. Published December 13, 2010
9. “Blurred lines of Influence,” by Kevin Crowe and Roxanna Popescu. Published December 14, 2010.
10. Ibid. “Blurred lines of influence.”
11. Ibid. “Blurred lines of influence.”
12. National Network for Immunization Information. “Adolescent and Adult Pertussis Vaccines.” December, 2006.
Si ringrazia Alessandro che ha tradotto la maggior parte dell'articolo.
Si ringrazia Alessandro che ha tradotto la maggior parte dell'articolo.
0 comments:
Post a Comment